<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Graphic Design, Advertising, Web in Yorkshire - Giles Cooke Design &#187; Graphic design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gilescooke.com/tag/graphic-design/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gilescooke.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Powerhouse Case Study</title>
		<link>http://www.gilescooke.com/powerhouse-case-study-471</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilescooke.com/powerhouse-case-study-471#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GilesCooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilescooke.com/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Client: powerhouse photography Leeds
June &#8211; August 2009
Background
Established Commercial Photographers in Leeds with varied client base.

Problem
Powerhouse was sometimes seen as just another commercial photographer in Yorkshire, abeit one of high standards and with some impressive names in their client base. After 10 years in the business with extensive food, and creative expertise, they were never seen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Client: powerhouse photography Leeds<br />
June &#8211; August 2009</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong><br />
Established Commercial Photographers in Leeds with varied client base.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/11/camera.jpg" alt="camera" title="camera" width="472" height="314" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-512" /></p>
<p><strong>Problem</strong><br />
Powerhouse was sometimes seen as just another commercial photographer in Yorkshire, abeit one of high standards and with some impressive names in their client base. After 10 years in the business with extensive food, and creative expertise, they were never seen as specialist suppliers of those photography styles (which of course they were). What needed to be done was to establish powerhouse as experts in their fields without alienating existing clients.</p>
<p><strong>Process</strong><br />
Initially we looked at existing designs for the logo, what we wanted to keep, and what we wanted to lose. We needed a logo that would work with all areas of the business. How the logo would work with other elements of Graphic Design, eg a Poster, Flyer or a Brochure, but mainly the Web where Powehouse do most of their marketing. </p>
<p>We looked at Powerhouse strengths, and really focused on them. They were creative photography, Food photography, Pack shot photography, and Interactive photography. We then built a structure for the brand, separating each element of the business into its own distinctive area, a specialist website for each, so that someone wanting food photography wont be looking at pack shot photography. </p>
<p>The existing brand was tired and being treated as word rather than a brand, it changed from letterhead to business card to website, for that reason it was not a strong brand for their competative market. We needed to rebuild that brand as a strong signifier of quality. </p>
<p>After a the initial idea stage we took favoured routes to the development stage and worked it into onto the new business structure. Here we all felt that the structure of the business should be clear through the brand internally, and externally to the potential  customer. Although it was necessary to explore a few different routes and ideas, we felt it important for everybody to be happy with the end result.</p>
<p><strong>Solution</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/11/ph2-logo.jpg" alt="ph2-logo" title="ph2-logo" width="472" height="314" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-472" /><br />
<img src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/11/Brand-spread.gif" alt="Brand-spread" title="Brand-spread" width="472" height="49" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-485" /></p>
<p><strong>From Neil Adams of Powerhouse</strong><br />
Our new brand and website has received great feedback, and turn visitors into actual customers. We worked with Giles throughout the re-brand process, and are really delighted with the results.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/11/webpages-ph.jpg" alt="webpages-ph" title="webpages-ph" width="472" height="302" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-502" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilescooke.com/powerhouse-case-study-471/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chickens Mules and two old fools</title>
		<link>http://www.gilescooke.com/chickens-mules-and-two-old-fools-348</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilescooke.com/chickens-mules-and-two-old-fools-348#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GilesCooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book cover design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chickens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mules and 2 old fools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilescooke.com/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just had an email from Victoria Twead saying that her book is now available in all good book stores including Harrods:
Hello Giles,
Just to let you know that &#8216;Chickens&#8217; is finally released, selling well (it&#8217;s even in Harrods) and that the cover looks fabulous!
‘Chickens’ is available online now from Amazon, WH Smith, Barnes and Noble, Waterstones [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/10/book-chickens-copy.jpg" alt="book-chickens-copy" title="book-chickens-copy" width="472" height="472" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-365" /></p>
<p>Just had an email from Victoria Twead saying that her book is now available in all good book stores including Harrods:</p>
<p>Hello Giles,</p>
<p>Just to let you know that &#8216;Chickens&#8217; is finally released, selling well (it&#8217;s even in Harrods) and that the cover looks fabulous!</p>
<p>‘Chickens’ is available online now from Amazon, WH Smith, Barnes and Noble, Waterstones and direct from my website. Then I got a surprise. Waterstones in Harrods, London, have ordered some copies. How exciting is that? Just to put icing on the cake, ‘Chickens’ sold out in the first few days on Amazon.UK and I’ve had some excellent reviews. I can hardly believe it’s all really happening&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilescooke.com/chickens-mules-and-two-old-fools-348/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graphic design, and it&#8217;s uneasy relationship with iStock</title>
		<link>http://www.gilescooke.com/graphic-design-and-its-uneasy-relationship-with-istock-339</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilescooke.com/graphic-design-and-its-uneasy-relationship-with-istock-339#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GilesCooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illustration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Istock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilescooke.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iStock is a resource for people to supply, buy and live in a virtual world of stock material aimed not only at the graphic designer/creative, but also at a much larger business audience. It is relatively cheap when you compare it to the more expensive/exclusive stock libraries, for example gettyimages (who recently purchased iStock and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iStock is a resource for people to supply, buy and live in a virtual world of stock material aimed not only at the graphic designer/creative, but also at a much larger business audience. It is relatively cheap when you compare it to the more expensive/exclusive stock libraries, for example gettyimages (who recently purchased iStock and ramped up the prices), but what does a professional graphic designer really get from iStock? Well, cheap photography from a self policing web community, with contributors worldwide supplying a wealth of source material. But I have noticed a backlash against this recently, where clients have said “yes, that image is a bit ‘iStock’”. The reason? In my view, as soon as any average photographer has the ability to make easy money with their brand new 12 megapixel digital camera, they quickly work out what people want to buy, and produce more of that; it is a simple supply and demand formula. And with less creative people now getting heavily involved in selecting photography, every design job has started to look the same, and we are getting creatively dull. Is there no room for the expert any more? The truth is the real talent won’t bother with it.</p>
<p>The iStock style has become scorned upon, the illustration is safer than a nice rabbit, the photography in the main is bland. There may be a certain amount of risk taking/creativity, but the problem is these images just don’t sell as well, so soon no-one will produce it anymore. One photographer I know saves his best work for himself, and puts his ‘rubbish’ on iStock as it may bring in £15 every now and again.</p>
<p>iStock was a good resource for designers to get their hands on hi-res, reasonable quality imagery. But, like everything in this world, it has become easier for anyone to design, shoot, write and gain an audience &#8211; which is great, but conversely we have lost quality and, more importantly, we have lost creativity.</p>
<p>What’s next for iStock? Well, they are now moving into generic branding, where designers can supply generic logos for generic businesses around the globe. No real thought about what the logo needs to do, a simple ‘change the word to stick with an icon’. This will be fine for companies up to a certain level, but to be serious about your brand and making it work for you, you will still need expert skills and knowledge.</p>
<p>My advice? Fight the machine, or at least get the job done right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilescooke.com/graphic-design-and-its-uneasy-relationship-with-istock-339/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logo Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.gilescooke.com/logo-evolution-205</link>
		<comments>http://www.gilescooke.com/logo-evolution-205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GilesCooke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interesting Finds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gilescooke.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s interesting to see how to see how the big corporations develop their logos over time, They all seem to develop to fit in with the fashion of the time, whilst retaining an element of history throughout. The success of some brands can be seen when they feel it can stand to lose the text [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see how to see how the big corporations develop their logos over time, They all seem to develop to fit in with the fashion of the time, whilst retaining an element of history throughout. The success of some brands can be seen when they feel it can stand to lose the text in a logo, see Nike and Apple. Most examples here operate the evolution, not revolution technique which retains existing brand values, see BMW. The Google brand philosophy remains the same, however the typography changes with the time. Pepsi has 2 distinctive brand movements, although they merge in the 50&#8217;s. Apple start from somewhere strange, and move to a simple icon we all recognise today. BMW play a safe hand throughout with a few typographical changes. Nike has the confidence to remove the word Nike and rely on the famous swoosh. Sony (like Google) retain the value of their brand name with simple typographic treatments.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-220" title="logo_pepsi" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/logo_pepsi5.jpg" alt="logo_pepsi" width="400" height="156" /></p>
<div id="attachment_218" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-218" title="logo-Sony" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/logo-Sony4.jpg" alt="Sony logo through history" width="400" height="127" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony logo through history</p></div>
<div id="attachment_217" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-217" title="Logo-Nike" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/Logo-Nike4.jpg" alt="Nike logo evolution" width="400" height="95" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nike logo evolution</p></div>
<div id="attachment_216" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img class="size-full wp-image-216" title="logo-bmw" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/logo-bmw4.jpg" alt="BMW logo through history" width="400" height="292" /><p class="wp-caption-text">BMW logo through history</p></div>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-215" title="logo-apple" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/logo-apple5.jpg" alt="logo-apple" width="400" height="177" /><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-210" title="logo-google" src="http://www.gilescooke.com/wp-content/2009/09/logo-google3.jpg" alt="logo-google" width="399" height="312" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gilescooke.com/logo-evolution-205/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
